Building in the gap
Markets institutional capital dismisses — and why that's the opportunity.
-
Neurodivergent cognition as competitive strategy in the age of average
AI is a regression-to-the-mean engine; as it homogenizes output, cognitive variance becomes the scarcest strategic input. Neurodivergent cognition is a large, underused reservoir of it — not a DEI cost-center, a competitive asset. The reframe requires the workplace protocols that stop suppressing it.
-
Non-consumer strategy: the 80% no EdTech VC will fund
Christensen's non-consumer frame applied honestly to the markets institutional capital dismisses — neurodivergent adults, regional builders, re-entry learners, late-career pivoters. The ~80% the credentialing system never reaches. The dismissal is the moat — and serving them is the slow, hard path, not a blue-ocean quick win.
-
Differentiation by experience in a post-content world
When AI makes content infinite and near-free, content stops being the moat. The defense against saturation is verifiable doing, the evidence of embodied experience that AI cannot fabricate, which credentialing exists to capture.
-
Building in the gap
Why the most important learning markets are the ones institutional capital dismisses — neurodivergent learners, regional builders, non-consumer tech — and why the gap is the opportunity, not the warning sign.